patching...
Breaking: Lt. Gov. Tim Murray to Resign »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

TELL US: Would You Want a Marijuana Dispensary in Town?

The medical marijuana ballot initiative passed on Tuesday, which means up to 35 medical marijuana dispensaries can open in 2013. Would you be OK with having one in town?

 

Medical marijuana is coming to Massachusetts. The question is: where?

The medical marijana ballot initiative that passed in Tuesdays election with 63 percent voter approval means that up to 35 medical marijuana dispensaries can open up in the state in 2013.

The new law goes into effect January 1, but requires rules and regulations be set up by the Department of Public Health.

Some towns and cities, such as Quincy, reportedly are already trying to line up regulations that would keep dispensaries out of their municipalities, which have proved troublesome in some of the nine states where medical marijuana dispensaries have been legal.

What do you think? Is this a classic case of NIMBY (fine, but Not In My Back Yard)? Or do medical marijuana dispensaries really not make sense in your town, but they're fine somewhere else — and if so, why?

Related Topics: Massachusetts medical marijuana, Medical Marijuana Massachusetts, Medical marijuana, marijuana dispensaries, and medical marijuana ballot initiative

MARASH GIRL

6:48 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Why would marijuana not be dispensed by prescription through a pharmacy?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margo

10:23 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Because Marijuana is a Schedule 1 drug and may not be prescribed by any doctors. By this bill it can only be recommended. So people will have POT SHOPS in their towns.

Just Saying

7:43 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

A very brief summary of the question that was voted on is as follows;
Each county has the opportunity to open a medicinal dispensary
The drug is still governed at the Federal Level as an illegal substance and cannot be prescribed for distribution in a pharmacy
One does not receive an actual physician prescription, there is a fine line here and a reccomendatiom based on medical need as demonstrated through your medical file must be obtained.

Reply

teresa

7:55 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I agree with the comment above that it should be dispensed through a pharmacy. I would not like to see a site in my neighborhood. I am shocked that it even was voted in favor of marijuana.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HawkSoccerMom

10:24 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

With all due respect Teresa, you shouldn't be shocked that it was voted in favor. I would be willing to bet that if you were more educated on the tremendous benefits, as well as it being a safe alternative to alcohol and the pills these pharmacys shove down everyones throat, that you would be more accepting to this concept. How many alcohol package stores do we have in Waltham?

Mary

8:15 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

What if they were adjacent to or inside the police stations or court houses? I am not clear on the actual composition of these dispensaries but closer to law enforcement is better than close to schools, imho.

Reply

Andie

8:15 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

IMO, it should only be dispensed through hospital pharmacies, and a very few of them at that. Surprised that it passed and the dying with dignity did not.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DaisyChain1953

10:37 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Do you think you are making sense or being rational Andie? "Ok, lets legalize medical marijuana, but only make it available to a very limited amount of dispenaries. Lets give these people even more of headache." Could you please explain to me how that makes any sense what-so-ever? For the life of me I can't figure out why people go out of their way to be extremely difficult.

Ben

8:29 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The proposal on the ballot was for dispensaries, not for alignment with the typical medical products distribution. That's why I voted against it. The wording was vague, and clearly intended to simplify distribution to non-medical users. Acton, and all responsible towns, should block dispensary licenses or only allow distribution of marijuana certified to have a completely legal supply chain from grower to the counter.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Turk

8:52 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Totally agree with Ben, For those that voted for this obviously did not take the time to think this through and like all ballots there never is a clear understanding of how things are worded. I personally would have liked to have had the experience of a debate on these questions vs candidates vying for a government position.

Comment_arrow

SilverCan984

9:18 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Turk - I took plenty of time to think this though, 16 years as a matter of fact. Before all of you open up and say "you all need to do more research" or "you need to take the time to look at how things are worded"... Did you ever stop to think about the fact that people knew EXACTLY how it was worded and voted based on the wording. Again, the people commenting negatively on this story are CLEARLY in the minority and need to move on.

Comment_arrow

Tom Smith

9:52 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Totally agree with SilverCan. Its offensive to say people did not think this though. Basically, what you are saying is that you are surprised that it passed, and people are obvisiouly slow and don't know how to read a ballot question appropriately. Just because you are in the minority, does not mean everyone else does not know how to read.

Just Saying

8:59 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The state as whole voted for marijuana distribution centers as a method to distribute medicinal marijuana. It will be governed by the board of health. That is what the majority won. An idealistic afterthought of its benefits or how to distribute is not impirtant at this point. Do your research folks, be vocal and make sure your legislators, selectmen and board of health know how you feel. This is very controversial in California and Oregon now that it is law. Oakland, CA is in a very expensive legal battle to close a center. Police are vocal about additional legal issues these centers bring. Do your research, know what your tax dollars will need to now cover and own it.
BTW-NIMBY

Reply
Comment_arrow

SilverCan984

9:42 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The world is moving forward with or without you. Stop trying to hold back the positive progress of others. This is a positive thing for Waltham, for Massachusetts, for New England, for the country, and for the entire world. Its called "FREEDOM", and its about time we are finally no longer ingorned from our government.

Comment_arrow

Susan

10:12 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Im pretty sure people used their chance to be vocal at the polls on Tuesday. The peoples voices have been heard, it looks like you may need to invest in a hearing-aid.

Reader99

9:06 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I think since it's medical marijuana it should be done through a pharmacy just like all other drugs that are prescribed.

Reply

Martha Creedon

9:07 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I think that's a misleading and irresponsible choice of photo there, Patch editors.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Karla Vallance

10:54 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Martha, can you share with me why you think the photos in the story are irresponsible? They are pictures of already existing dispensaries in California, the state with perhaps the longest experience with medical marijuana dispensaries. For those not familiar, I thought it would be helpful to see what a couple of dispensaries look like.

Comment_arrow

SilverCan984

12:39 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Karla Vallance - it seems as though you are not going to answer the question, but on the Waltham Patch facebook page it says "i doubt residents of waltham would want a dispensary" If you are going to ask other people why your photo is misleading, can I ask you What facts do you have to support your statement that Waltham residents would most likely not want a dispensary? Or are you trying to sway people with your own personal opinion?

Comment_arrow

SilverCan984

12:46 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

according to the polls on Tuesday, I would say Waltham is more likely to have a dispensary then not. Im trying to figure out where your doubt comes from.

Comment_arrow

Margo

10:30 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Karla, take a look at this. This is what we are getting our selves into.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1USWdiJ-nc

Just Saying

9:13 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I could see why you think that, but that is a legal marijuana distribution center the green cross in the window is the indicator.

Reply

SilverCan984

9:13 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Karla Vallance - why do you doubt that residents would want a dispensary in Waltham? Considering the fact that question 3 overwhelmingly passed in the ENTIRE STATE, including WALTHAM. The people who are shocked by this decision are clearly in the minority.

Reply

Reader99

9:26 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I think medical marijuana is a good idea but why set up separate places to distribute it? Why not do it through a pharmacy? I think there would be less chance of misuse of it that way. That's all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SilverCan984

9:33 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

exactly how does one "misuse" cannabis?

Comment_arrow

Reader99

1:26 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

It's for medical use only and if dispensed at pharmacies chances are better that it will be given to those who need it for medical uses only. That's what I meant. You know like all the other pills we take that are prescription drugs. We go to the phamacy and they make them up for us when we show a doctor's prescription.

Comment_arrow

Just Saying

1:51 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

There already is prescription form of marijuana which is a pill: marinol available in pharmacies. The distribution center is separate and distinct. It is a way to eliminate state criminal and civil penalties for those who meet a specific set of medical criteria to produce, distribute and in specific cases or hardship grow marijuana for their own use and not use the pill prescription form. The prescription/pharmacy type is separate and distinct.

Just Saying

9:38 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Federal law does not recognize marijuana as a legal drug. Pharmacies are governed by federal and state law; therefore, they cannot distribute it. Also this is owned by the board of health not the FDA.

Reply

Tom Smith

9:54 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Fully support dispensaries in Waltham.

Reply

Susan

9:59 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I support dispensaries 100% in Waltham and in Massachusetts.

Reply

BlueCollarHardWorker

10:06 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Its amazing to me how something could pass so easily on a ballot question, and yet we still have people crying and complaining that it didn't go their way. Its every excuse in the book "people didn't know what they were voting for". ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. SUPPORT WALTHAM DISPENSARIES.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margo

10:35 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

As a “non-profit” industry, treatment facilities and grow operations would NOT be subject to property taxes, or sales taxes, even if sales exceed millions of dollars annually, and treatment center owners collect six-figure salaries. While the law claims registration fees will offset costs, the actual costs of properly enforcing the law (as a mini-DEA) will be in the millions of dollars – a price tag too high to be paid for by simple registration fees from 35 facilities. Beyond the licensing fee, there is no revenue to set up the separate, unique government run dispensary system or the regulation, inspections and enforcement to oversee it. Our currently stressed, underfunded DPH is charged with that job, the very agency that just cost taxpayers millions with their drug lab debacle caused by one employee. This month, Boulder Colorado’s City Council is working to re-craft their marijuana pot store regulation because their public health department loses hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in the administrative costs to oversee and regulate them. (For context, in 2007 a “treatment center” opened in Almeda County, California. The first year sales revenues were $79K, the second year were $1.3 million, the 3rd year they brought in $21 million, and in the first 6 months of the fourth year revenues were a whopping $26.3 million)

QET

10:22 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I really wouldn't care. It just isn't that scary.

Reply

DaisyChain1953

10:41 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I support dispensaries in Waltham

Reply

Alice H

10:47 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

How do I get a license to own and operate a dispensary?

Reply

NightNews

10:53 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

There is absolutely no reason why Waltham shouldn't have dispensaries. I fully back and support it.

Reply

Scott S

10:59 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The photo made me think that one of the seedy liquor stores in Waltham could be closed, renovated, and used as a dispensary. I'm guessing the photo is from Colorado, and that is what happened there.

Reply

Stephen

11:01 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I have been a life-long resident of Waltham. I went to elementary,middle, and high school in this lovely city. I could not have been more happier for the people of this city,state and this country than I was on Tuesday. I am not a marijuana user, but I totally support both the new law, and dispensaries in Waltham

Reply

Cheryl

11:15 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I wonder if all you people are going to appolgize for making everyones path on the road to a better life as miserable as you possibly can. I doubt it. After this has been around for a year, and absolutely nothing negative has come of it, where will you all be then? Its time to stop with the misinformation and the old way of thinking. SUPPORT WALTHAM AND LOCAL DISPENSARIES.

Reply

Nina

11:20 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Great to have a dispensary in Waltham, reusing an old eyesore storefront and bringing new business interest to this town. Moody Street would be appropriate since the Canabis does elevate mood!

Reply

John Casey

11:56 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I literally want to rip the hair out of my head. Question 3 passed. What don't you people understand about that??!? There are a select group of people out there that don't get it, and never ever will. Just like our government has ignored us for so long, its time to flip the script and put the minorty on this issue on ignore. Im tired of arguing for something that over 65% of the states residents voted in favor of. People want to call themselves American by excersizing their right to vote, but when the results come in, and they don't like the outcome, well then it starts to become a different story of how we are not going to allow something to happen. I dont know who the hell you people think you are.

I support the new law, and dispensaries in Waltham. Let freedom ring.

Reply

Paul Hughes

12:27 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Waltham resident - father of 3
I support dispensaries in Waltham

Reply

Nathanael Pine

12:36 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Great then it's settled, Waltham will have the dispensaries. Watertown doesn't need them then.

Reply

Just Saying

12:56 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

SilverCan984 and Susan-
I have supplied facts regarding what was voted for by this state and how it works in other states where this is law. In this post and others I am simply clearing up why we cannot distribute in pharmacies or police stations, what some of facts are of question 3 and that I would prefer not to have distribution centers in my town. I have asked people to exercise their freedom, go out and be heard. I never once said I did or did not vote in favor of question 3.
Calling people names, erroneously stating I am hearing impaired or saying I am holding you back is false and not progressive.
In fact not only can I hear, I can read, gather people and speak to the topic with facts and knowledge. THAT IS FREEDOM.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SilverCan984

2:50 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

It's the way you say "this is already a growing problem in california" (nothing could be further from the truth by the way) come on people, let your voices be heard" attitude is what I am referring to.

Comment_arrow

Just Saying

3:20 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

If you choose to quote me, get the quote right, review and check your interpretation prior to posting. You are wrong. I never said "this is already a growing problem in California" only you did. Any inflection or way about it YOU placed on it.
In summary I said the topic and location of distribution centers is controversial and costly. I then supported my statement. I went on to speak about the current issue in the city of Oakland and the lawsuit there as being costly because people waited until after the center was open to be vocal and cost taxpayers large sums of money. I also stated that the police have their point of view as several police agencies have gone on record about this and it is up to individuals to make sure either themselves or their proxy speak up. Cities and towns need to be represented and get this right the first time around. Don't waste other people's money because you didn't speak about the location of the centers. The people need to be proactive not reactive.
It isn't the way I said something. Self reflect that you added that to my post. It is your interpretation.

soccer guz

1:39 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

YEA!! right next to burger king!

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Franklin Tucker

2:01 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

soccer guz, you win for suggesting the best location for dispensaries. And with "The Big Lebowski" on my mind, how about dispensaries and bowling alleys!

Pat

2:30 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I am confused how can a state vote to allow when is still against federal law? I would not like it in my area but I have never used it. I am afraid that it will be misused as are perscription drugs are now.

Reply

Andie

3:35 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I'm laughing at those of you who have already decided where the dispensaries will be, like you have any say in the matter? I read somewhere that there will be only ONE dipsensary per county, if that, and since there are 14 counties in Massachusetts those of you who are smart enough can do the math yourselves.

Reply

Just Saying

3:41 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Actually Andie there is a minimum of one per county and a maximum of 5 per county for an aggregate total not to exceed 35. From there it is up to the board of health to determine if more permits can be issued. In your town/city there are elected officials who can advocate for a distribution center and/or zoning against it.

Reply

Catch Wity

5:01 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Good luck to anyone that even tries to open a dispensary in Waltham, save your money and find a different city. I promise you that you'll be harassed by the police, will be faced with illegal harassment of your so called patients, unlawful surveillance, illegal search & seizures! If you do make sure your lawyers office is upstairs, next door, downstairs, in your back room & on call 24/7!!!!!!

Reply

Roth Gill

5:20 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I wouldn't mind a dispensary in my neighborhood, would certainly be nicer than a package store. I still don't understand why we voted for "Medical Marijuana" when any clear thinking individual would understand that the majority of pot smokers are not in it for the medical benefit. I think Washington and Colorado did right in making it a straight recreational substance, no different than picking up a 6 pack on Friday night. I don't need to ask my doctor for a prescription for a beer, I shouldn't need to ask for a prescription for weed. I think this is one step closer....but come on....a prescription for weed?

Reply

danielle

5:30 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

First you can't just go to cvs, yes its a prescription but you have to pay for it. There won't be a copay and your health insurance won't cover the cost, neither will any food stamps money. PEOPLE read the bill that was past. Plus if you have children they aren't allowed in a dispenser. Would you want your local pharmacy smelling like WEED! I don't. For anyone states no in my town it is already here and there are worse drugs out there and liquor stores on every corner. For those of us with disabling medical problems yes medical marijuana does help. Just be greatfull that we only past medical use unlike Colorado and Washington states that will make it legal to smoke for everyone 18+.

Reply

Debbie

5:48 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

All I can say is this: I survived cancer (stage four Hodgkins Disease) twice. The first round of chemo was very difficult. I was throwing up before I left the chemo lounge. I tried every medicine they would prescribe including TCH pills. Nothing worked. Nothing. Finally at the urging of my chemo nurse I smoked pot. It was a MIRACLE. I could function. I could eat. I could keep the medicine IN my system. I am alive. I did not get "addicted" nor did I use it as a gateway drug. I gave it up when I was done with my chemo. I am 20 years cancer free and I thank my doctors, my attitude and yes, pot.

Reply

Allan W McCombs

7:35 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Waltham already has too many businesses. Why not have one in Burlington and employ our residences?

Reply

Walthamguy

1:03 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

TELL US: Would You Want a Marijuana Dispensary in Town?

OMG, as if we didn't already have dozens if not hundreds of them!

Reply

Chris O'Hara

5:30 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

People have been conditioned to believe alcohol is safer than cannabis....thats why its easier for people to ignore the death and destruction brought on by alcohol use....and pounce on any lie misleading statement outdated study with seriously flawed methodology and use it as fact.....

Id rather full legalization and cannabis stores than package stores......

Reply

Allan W McCombs

7:48 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

We learned during 18th amendment that legal alcohol is safer than illegal alcohol.
When was cannabis illegal, 1937? What have we learned since then?

Reply

Paul Hurteau

1:37 pm on Saturday, November 10, 2012

Why not just sell it through liquor stores??

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margo

10:40 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

As DOJ has said on many occasions, Congress has determined through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that marijuana is a Schedule I drug and as such growing, distributing, and possessing marijuana in any capacity save a federal research program is in “violation of federal law regardless of state laws permitting such activities” (U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011). DOJ has further stated that “this core priority [of disrupting drug trafficking organizations] includes prosecution of business enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana”(U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011).

Reader99

8:56 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

I think they should be dispensing it in Lexington.

Reply

Local Table

1:10 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Does your town have a liquor store? Consider the amount of underage drinking and DUI offenses and then compare these awful outcomes to the positive impact for people who need medically prescribed marijuana, emphasis on the word 'prescribed'. Vicodin and OxyContin are prescribed in our local pharmacies, so why not marijuana? Liquor stores have licenses and rules to follow, why not marijuana dispensaries?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margo

10:24 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

As DOJ has said on many occasions, Congress has determined through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that marijuana is a Schedule I drug and as such growing, distributing, and possessing marijuana in any capacity save a federal research program is in “violation of federal law regardless of state laws permitting such activities” (U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011). DOJ has further stated that “this core priority [of disrupting drug trafficking organizations] includes prosecution of business enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana”(U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011).
...

Comment_arrow

Margo

10:41 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Because Marijuana is FEDERALLY ILLEGAL.

As DOJ has said on many occasions, Congress has determined through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that marijuana is a Schedule I drug and as such growing, distributing, and possessing marijuana in any capacity save a federal research program is in “violation of federal law regardless of state laws permitting such activities” (U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011). DOJ has further stated that “this core priority [of disrupting drug trafficking organizations] includes prosecution of business enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana”(U.S. DOJ, U.S. Attorneys Durkan and Ormsby, April 14, 2011).

Comment_arrow

Local Table

11:27 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Marijuana does not meet the qualifications to be a Schedule 1 controlled substance, even though it is classified as such. The origins of why marijuana is included with cocaine and heroin as a Schedule 1 controlled substance include misperception, economic interests and historical racial fears and discrimination. Yet legally prescribed drugs such as Oxycontin could qualify as a Schedule 1 controlled substance. My point is that when a drug is deemed medically helpful, state and local officials try to regulate its distribution, although the potential for misuse and/or abuse cannot be fully prevented. This happens every day all across our nation since alcohol is by far, the true gateway drug and ongoing substance of choice for many addicts. Most 21 year olds have been drinking for years before they legally enter a liquor store, and, they are not required to have any special training to do so, or to work in one.

Margo

10:37 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Zoning: Marijuana “treatment centers” and grow operations could be allowed anywhere in a city or town, including areas located next to schools, churches, playgrounds, hospitals, athletic fields, parks, etc. Treatment centers are nothing more than pot stores – they sell all strands of raw pot and “medibles” – candy, cookies, fudge, ice cream, gelato, pastes, you name it – all and any foods can be infused with marijuana. In California, they called them treatment stores in the beginning, but now they’re called “clubs”. We call them pot shops – or pot stores. Anyone 21 years or older could own and operate a pot store, with no special training – not even a high school diploma. No pharmacist, doctor or medical professional would be on staff. In California and Colorado, they’ve had big employment campaigns targeting high school graduates and college age kids to work in them.

Reply

Allan W McCombs

5:45 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Margo, copy & pasting is spamming.
With regards to the youtube, it seems that more than 50% have disagreed with the last part of a better solution, as there is not a better solution.
You obviously do not have one of the medical conditions to get a card otherwise you would know that many times that man-made drugs are sometimes worse than the disease itself.
Marijuana is not the problem, the problem is that the politicians are wasting our tax dollars while writing the laws that have the loops holes, maybe on purpose for job security. But that's a different debate.

Reply

Anonymous

9:20 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Everyone just needs so try it, and then decide if it’s really that bad. Maybe not make decisions without a firsthand opinion. Maybe educate them selves on why it’s even federally illegal in the first place. Take a look back into American history and you will realize how hypocritical the whole situation is.

Reply

Gahley

9:53 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

I feel as if they made the right decision..Plenty of peoplr struggle to get their own marijuana for all types of reasons..but when you have a illness or disease that marijuana can help or treat you bet people are going to use that solution..think of it alcohol is a "addictive" drug YET how many bars/liquor stores are surrounded in woburn? Way to many.. also think of this take a look in ur medicine cabinet how many prescripted pills do u have that has 10x more harm than marijuana..plus there are to many people in prison for marijuana when we need other people that do worse crimes in jail ..people say marijuana is an addictive drug.. yet u have no clue what ur saying.. ive been smokng pot for years and i can resist not smoking..as for an example my father has hepititas C, depression,anxiety and so on.. so your telling me that my father has to take a risk of getting arrested just so he can be happy.if medical marijuana gets approved in woburn we will see an economic growth in our society due to all these dispensaries making millions of dollars

Reply

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

3:44 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

If Sudbury has liquor stores, why wouldn't we be able to have Medicinal Marijuana Dispensaries? Let's drop the government propaganda agenda and be real for a minute. Liquor is way worse than marijuana and we all know it. How often do you hear about someone getting stoned and going home to beat their wife? But if I'm being honest with myself... of course Sudbury won't have a dispensary.. why? Because this is Sudbury! The army of overprotective parents and do-gooders wouldn't allow that! There will probably be a dispensary or two in Natick or Framingham, so I'm not complaining.

Reply

mrpushrod

9:59 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I can't believe how many people have their heads in the sand. Absolutely we should allow dispensaries in Waltham. Furthermore, I am getting sick and tired of pot being illegal for no reason. Most of the people trying to suppress the legalization drink or take prescription pills of some sort. We need to stop the stupid laws that criminalize pot. We are wasting valuable money fighting something so foolish. I bet if we drug tested the waltham police force for pot they would all be in jail.

Reply

mrpushrod

10:03 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I can't believe how many people have their heads in the sand. Absolutely we should allow dispensaries in Waltham. Furthermore, I am getting sick and tired of pot being illegal for no reason. Most of the people trying to suppress the legalization drink or take prescription pills of some sort. We need to stop the stupid laws that criminalize pot. We are wasting valuable money fighting something so foolish. Who can't get pot off of the streets anyways. I bet if we drug tested the waltham police force for pot they would all be in jail. Dunkin Doughuts in Waltham would go under. What value added are we getting for our hard earned tax dollar fighting this substance?

Reply

pmotw

12:34 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

"What difference does it make?" We need the tax revenue to support big government!

Reply

Leave a comment